Europeans like Monet borrowed ideas from 19th century Japanese printmakers like Hokusai and Hiroshige to create designs of great spacial depth. These Japanese artists took linear perspective with its vanishing points and eye level(sight line)paradigm from Europeans. Here are diagrams and examples showing how space can be divided to suggest greater depth with a higher horizon, then how to design greater depth with both motion and volumetric variety.
In my first panel of 4 squares observe that 1st panel is divided equally. We have a natural predilection for such order as given by symmetry. Unfortunately, this symmetrical solution divides the picture into equal parts and they separate. They now have poor unity or cohesion. Such symmetry also provides a feeling of stasis, no motion. If you wish your image to be fixed and unmoving as in a symbol or flag then this design works but, it frustrates ambiguity, motion and unity which are basic ingredients for a successful painting. In the 2nd panel the units are again equally divided and again, we have another flat pattern or flag design. But, in the 3rd panel the dividing lines are packed progressively closer together at the top of the square. This presentation suggests a feeling of space to us. And, this was a design developed by the Japanese and borrowed by Monet and other Impressionists. They also borrowed tipping or canting that set of lines and curving them as you can see in the 4th panel. If lines are curved and discontinuous ( or broken) then we perceive space, motion and volume in the design.
In this 2nd example, notice that the sight-line/horizon is tipped. It is also broken as is the triangular shape aiming to intersect with that sight-line. Also broken(or intermittent) is the curved line above the sight line. The cumulative effect creates a design with added motion and space. We can’t help but connect the broken line in our minds and create a feeling a continuity to the line. We fill it in. It’s what we always do. Here are examples with superimposed diagrams of broken triangles suggesting deep space when they are coupled to an elevated horizon, especially to an elevated and dissolving horizon. See which examples offer more motion at the expense of stability, a quality I am happy to lose in my effort to build deep dynamic space.
Here the high horizon with a receding triangle design is capped by a vague horizontal shape, the city skyline.
Here the image relies upon complementary color contrast as well as the triangular design which evolves into a more slowly receding zigzag pattern.
Here the triangle tips left and evolves into a zigzag. And, In the last example the primary triangular pattern is not only tipped with the entire horizon but, it is also counter-crossed by other diagonals which helps to flatten the plane.










fran
Outstanding post. This is one of the most meaningful and effectively clear, lucid explanations of depth I have ever read. Thank you, David. Wish you were still on TV – miss your programming.
Kay H.
This really was exceptionally clarifying.
Tania
Thankyou David, I have never had this so concisely explained to me with such good visual aids. It’s very helpful, thanks again.
Lorraine
Your posts on composition have become accelerated lessons for me in my work. I think your approach is a step above what I have experienced in my local community. Thanks.
Paul Filipowicz
Thanks David,
I love the simplification. I hate extra words.
Fredric Neuwirth
Examples #6 & #7: In example #6 my eye wants to bring up the horizon line and create stability; In example #7 it is clear that the lines and planes are in conflict creating both depth and motion. I am sure that the original ( large scale ) it is even clearer. Contrasting color also helps.
Connie Simmons
My eye wants to do the same thing as well!
Cynthia McLoughlin
Looking forward to seeing you demonstrate this in the fall and trying to incorporate it into my paintings. Great post!