Following conventions we know how to make and recognize a pie. We begin with a circle; a circular pie plate fitted with a circular crust. We know it’s a pie when it comes in a circle. Pictures follow similar conventions. Pies and Pictures follow standard models. We improvise on the model. Whether painting an interior or painting street scene the basic model remains. There are two flanking walls and a ground that recede in synchrony according the principles of linear perspective.
In the mid 1800s Japanese artists like Hiroshige borrowed the standard western model of a populated view down an avenue and also applied the principles of linear perspective (example 1). Artists like Monet improvised with this standard model. In his train station series we find the two conventional flanking walls and the receding floor or ground (Example 2). His innovations were to cap the rectangle with a triangle, dissolve some edges and focal acuity through atmospherics with glaring sunlight and locomotive steam.
Later in the twentieth century artists like Giacometti who were well versed in linear perspective applied the traditional model to an interior (example 3). The sitting figure assumes the role of Monet’s locomotive. The edges come in and out of focus as we move into the space. 21st century artists like Paige Laughlin again return to innovate with the standard interior model and allow the furniture to function as the flanking walls while the beholder follows the floor’s linear vectors into the picture. Her image offers a secondary grid using a squared assembly of four artworks on the far wall. They serve as both a destination and a device to expand the space (example 4).
Example 3. Alberto Giacometti, mid 20th century,

Example 4. Paige Laughlin, contemporary,

Just as Paige Laughlin used complementary color relationships, orange vs. ultramarine blue and yellow vs. violet I used similar complementary colors when developing my “57th Street in the Rain” (examples 5 and 6). Impressionists were found of using tints, that is mixing white into their colors for a lighter brighter effect. You may observe I did the same. I blurred the edges and the shape of the objects more than Monet could have dared in the 1870s. He lacked precedents for such distortions but, photography would soon provide ample examples.
Example 5. Step one, 57th Street Rain,

Example 6. Step two, 57th Street Rain,

Returning to the more limited palette of both Hiroshige and Monet I began painting my next example 7, “East 62nd”. I followed Monet’s atmospheric dissolution of edges especially in the distance and on the flanking walls. Monet’s urban atmosphere was occluded by locomotive steam. My atmosphere evokes vaporizing sunlight. The rectangular dark frame also alludes to structures found in the previous examples.




Luz
Love yor last painting. Really ilustrates the ideas. Thanks
Luz
Your last idea
Gail Ingis
David, interesting concepts. Reminds me of my painting of Surf Avenue last week, and the appearance of a mist rising from the street in the distance, similar to your yellow rectangular shape in the foreground, all examples of the use of tints and the dissolution of edges made clear in your example 7. Thank you for sharing . . . as always!
Ruth Hill
What a wonderful teacher — thank you so much!
Fredric Neuwirth
Example #7
The painting expands with space
The monotone blue has a calmness &a quiet not normal for a city
I would like you to remove the canopy & structure, the sign post They distract
And restrict the space
Patricia Scanlan
O how I will miss these blogs every Tuesday! Thank you ever so much for all that you put into each blog and each class. These paintings are so amazing. I have so much to learn to get these colors this way.
Joyce Go
Love how you explain each concept, David! And your paintings seem effortlessly done. What a master!