New York’s Museum of Modern Art once devoted an entire exhibition demonstrating how the compositional traditions of painters were passed on to photographers. Early photographers made images on the basis of paintings they had seen. It was the their vocabulary. Eventually painting and photography would share an innovative mutually influenced relationship. Today the border has almost dissolved between the photography and painting. In 1861, only a decade after the death of J.M.W.Turner and 22 years after the invention of photography, the French photographer E. Colliau took this shot of a French country village ( example 1). His composition shows the influence of landscape painters like Turner. The idea of a frame within a frame, a scene within a scene, a window within a window. The painting itself being the first window; the framed alley being the second (example 2, Turner’s early career oil painting). While Turner’s painting has more narrative complexity, more atmosphere, and better design unity through the use of reflection, and more subtle constructions taking you infinitely back into a the life of the city the comparison is still clear as you see in Colliau’s mimicry of Turner’s motif.
Turner’s prediction that photography would become ubiquitous with future artists has proved to be true. What he could not have anticipated is the enormity of technological advances in the uses of photography in relationship to painting. Today an artist, like me or you, can take an image and manipulate it to appear painterly in Photoshop. Or better yet, we can marry the two mediums directly. In the following examples observe how the photo image is manipulated through the application of oil painting to its surface. I am able to do this because 3M makes a transparency film which is receptive to paint and, may be run through a Canon Pixma ( or other brand) inkjet printer. Here are two examples . First, you see the original photo which is followed by the same image only overpainted with oils. Note that some elements of the original image are preserved but, the image itself has mutated significantly. The first example is a photo I presented in an earlier blog which then receives the oil paint manipulation.
The next examples are a photo of a stream followed by the same image after over-painting with oils. Note the direction, speed and identity of the image is profoundly altered but, it is still possible to trace the influence of the original photo.
Finally, I wish to extend my personal invitation to you to come to my next lecture at the Silvermine Art Center in New Canaan, Ct. on Sunday May 6, 2012 at 5 PM. The subject: “How To Stimulate Your Creativity and, How To Sell It” is based on recent research in the fields of psychology, economics, art history, and neuro-science.








Dawn
David, for those of us who are unable to attend your May 5th presentation . . . would you post the text ? ? ?
Dina
Yes, I’m on the West Coast, but would love to see it on youtube or as text, if possible.
Fredric Neuwirth
I hope you bring these examples to class this morning. They look wonderful. I am glad you explained the Turner ( which I have always liked ) of a frame within a frame.
Gloria Carbaugh
David, I would love to have been able to attend your lecture on stimulating creativity, but live too far away. You mentioned recent research. What are you reading now? I’ve learned some really surprising things from books on your reading list. Thanks!