Van Gogh, a master of linear perspective and composition, exaggerated traditional designs. Through his knowledge of 17th century masters like Poussin and Claude, he was able to persuasively improvise with their compositions. He could broaden his use of color because artists of the late 19th century had many more colors at their disposal. He amplified and exaggerated the rhythm of the lines, edges and shapes in his compositions. See how his compositions are a part of Claude’s legacy (example 1). In 1870 Corot further experimented with the Claudian landscape using rhythmic and tactile brushstrokes (example 2). Later, Van Gogh extends Corot’s experiments as he compresses the picture’s space but, continues to rely on the receding serpentine shape of the road and stairs. They give us a feeling of deepening space. Like Claude and Corot, Van Gogh used a framing Coulisse on the left and right (example 3).
example 1. Claude Lorraine 1600’s landscape.

example 2. Corot’s landscape of 1870.

example 3. Van Gogh 1890 landscape.

What follows are examples of another meandering recession but, using 21st century technology, further exaggeration of forms, and further degradation of legible shapes as they slip between abstraction and representation.
Let’s begin with a shore scene. Example 4 shows my original photograph. Example 5 shows that photograph after blurring and edge degradation which oblige the viewer to make more guesses about the picture’s content. Example 6 presents the image after its manipulation by painting tools (squeegees, fingers, brushwork).
example 4. original shore/beach photo.

example 5. photo after obscuring exaggerations.

example 6. mash up of photo and painting materials.

The next examples borrow Van Gogh’s receding linear perspective and compositional traditions. I begin with a photo of midtown Manhattan which was deliberately blurred when shooting and further distorted with Photoshop (example 7). The image receives additional distortions in example 8 through manipulations in both Photoshop and my printer. Example 9 presents the image after the application of painting materials (squeegees, fingers, paints and brushwork). The manipulations to this image were made into the wet inks from my Epson printer on a non-absorbent surface.
example 7. original Blurred photo.

example 8. photo after printer and software manipulations.

example 9. photo after use of painting materials.


Jan Burgess
Just wanted to say thanks again for letting us play along with you. (oh, can you enlarge your font so I don’t have to manipulate the screen image?)
David Dunlop
HI Jan,
Thanks for your idea. I will pass it along. I read blogs, even my own on an Ipad and, all I do is enlarge the image by touch spreading my fingers. I wish my computer responded similarly.
David
Fredric Neuwirth
van Gogh certainly had more exuberance than either Claude or Corot but isn’t part of his charm the distortion? Wasn’t part of this due to his inability to draw? Style can be misleading and painting can be difficult
particularly in the rendering of objects; flowers,trees, stairs?
Examples #4 thru #9 are interesting distortions and must be difficult to render but some how they are missing the mark. Perhaps one part of the distortion needs more clarity to focus on? and what happened to the space ? It seems flat. (it is hard to tell in the small photos )
David Dunlop
HI Fred,
I am constricted by the blog server with the number of megabytes I can place within a blogpost. This means that if I want many images in a blogpost they must be small.
I would make them big and rich if I could.
Thanks, David